Issue 041 — July 2026
A PC-only games siteCum recenzămAbonează-te
PCGame·Pilot
Comparison

ABI vs Gray Zone Warfare

Both chase the tactical extraction crowd, but from opposite ends: Gray Zone Warfare is a slow, milsim-leaning open-world firefight, while ABI is a tighter, faster, free raid-based looter. The choice comes down to whether you want immersive milsim atmosphere or a polished, accessible loop.

ABI vs Gray Zone Warfare
AspectABIGray Zone WarfareEdge
Realism & difficultyGrounded but accessible, tuned so newcomers can survive and learn rather than get stomped in the first minute.Milsim-first: deliberate pacing, real map/compass navigation and heavy medical detail that punish rushing and reward patience.Tie
Gunplay, ballistics & armorSnappy, refined gunplay with mature armor and penetration systems that already feel finished.Satisfying, weighty ballistics and bullet-drop, but gunfeel and animations were still rough and evolving through Early Access.ABI
Maps & extractionDiscrete, curated raid maps with clear extracts you queue into and escape from.One vast seamless open world (Lamang island, ~42km2) you traverse continuously, a genuinely different, more expedition-like structure.Gray Zone Warfare
Economy & lootStreamlined traders, marketplace and insurance with strong quality-of-life and quick, readable loot management.Faction-vendor economy tied to a lengthy task tree, deeper on immersion but clunkier and slower to interact with.ABI
Progression & wipesSeasonal wipes and clear task/level progression that keeps a steady sense of advancement.Long task-and-faction progression with a persistent-world feel and fewer hard resets, better for players who hate wipes.Tie
Monetisation (F2P vs buy-in)Free to play, offset by an aggressive in-game shop and paid storage that invite pay-to-win concern.Paid Early Access buy-in (~$35) with no cash-shop grind, a cleaner, more honest monetization model.Gray Zone Warfare
Performance & anti-cheatWell-optimized on modest hardware with kernel-level ACE anti-cheat.Gorgeous UE5 visuals that are demanding and were performance-rough in Early Access, with AI that could break immersion.ABI

Two very different reads on "realism"

Arena Breakout: Infinite and Gray Zone Warfare (GZW) get lumped together as 2024's big new extraction shooters, but they chase realism from opposite directions. ABI, from Tencent's MoreFun Studios, is a tight, session-based Tarkov successor: discrete maps, quick queue-in, loot, extract. GZW, from Madfinger Games, is a slow-burn open-world milsim built in Unreal Engine 5 — one huge seamless island, Lamang, that you insert into by helicopter and cross on foot over long, deliberate patrols.

Gameplay & combat

ABI is faster to the action. You load into a bounded map, fights come to you, and a raid is measured in minutes. GZW is the opposite: sprawling terrain, real distance, and a pace where an entire session can pass with only a handful of contacts. GZW leans harder into milsim texture — three PMC factions, an AI-task system that sends you to real GPS coordinates on your tablet, meaningful travel time, and squad coordination as a survival tool. ABI's shooting is more refined and readable moment to moment; GZW's is punishing at range, with genuine bullet travel and a health system that will have you managing wounds far from any exit.

Polish & state of the game

Both are young, but their launch reputations differ. ABI arrived comparatively polished, with clean UI and a stable core loop praised by outlets covering it. GZW launched into Steam Early Access rougher — beautiful vistas but notable bugs, AI quirks, performance dips and server issues that dominated early coverage. Madfinger has patched steadily, and the ambition is enormous, but GZW still openly wears its work-in-progress status.

  • ABI strengths: tighter loops, better first-year polish, cleaner anti-cheat story, gorgeous but performance-friendly maps, free-to-play entry.
  • GZW strengths: genuine open-world scale, helicopter insertions, deep milsim immersion, PvEvP tension across an entire island.
  • Shared caveat: both are new and evolving; endgame depth is still being built out.

Progression & monetisation

ABI is free-to-play with an in-game economy that has drawn ongoing pay-to-win scrutiny. GZW is a paid Early Access title with cosmetic-oriented monetisation and no wipe-driven paywalls, which some players prefer for its cleaner value proposition, even if the buy-in filters out casual curiosity.

Which should you play?

Play ABI if you want the extraction fix in efficient, replayable bursts with strong polish and a low barrier to entry. Play GZW if you crave immersion over efficiency — the roleplay of trekking across contested jungle, coordinating a squad, and treating every firefight as a genuine event. They scratch the same itch at different speeds, and it is entirely reasonable to keep both installed for different moods.

ABI vs Gray Zone Warfare — screenshot 1ABI vs Gray Zone Warfare — screenshot 2ABI vs Gray Zone Warfare — screenshot 3

The verdict

Choose Gray Zone Warfare if you crave a seamless open-world milsim you can lose yourself in and don't mind paying in and tolerating Early Access rough edges. Choose ABI if you want a free, polished, faster raid loop with tighter gunplay and smoother performance, at the cost of GZW's atmosphere and scale.

← All ABI comparisons